Liiike, hi again~! It's valley-ame, totally back for another exciting news post, yaa-- *shot*
Okay, no, actually I have to put on a srs faic for a little bit. Our last season of ladder competition ended a couple weeks ago, and we had to post-pone verifying the winners because we couldn't the logs for a little bit and blahdeblahdeblah
Okay, so, we got the logs.
And I'm happy to say that I can't prove that anyone was boosting this time. Now, whether that's because no one did, which I'm going to put on my rose-coloured glasses and believe, or because we lost all of the battle logs from april-onwards thanks to a technical error and therefore wouldn't see if anyone did, I can't say. That error has been resolved going forward; it was a silent plug-in update to PO and noone knew about it until we needed it and blahblah it happened and shouldn't happen again OKAY point is nobody was boosting as far as we can prove.
Which is good.
However.
A different issue that's been going on for a much longer period of time was brought to my attention. That is, ladder sniping.
Sniping works like so:
Suppose there are two players on the ladder, a 1400 player and a 1300 player. In a perfect universe, the 1400 player will always beat the 1300 player. However, because of the disparity in rating, the 1400 player will gain fewer points and the 1300 player will lose fewer points in that scenario, than if the ratings were closer. This is what keeps the ladder balanced, and fair.
Sniping is when, for instance, that 1400 player gets on an alt, ranked 1200, and fights that 1300 player. In a perfect universe, because the 1200-ranked alt is actually a 1400 player, the 1300 player will still lose. However, because the 1300 player is losing to an alt with a lower ranking, that player loses more points, significantly decreasing their ladder score.
This is problematic on its own because it puts an artificial directed stress and unfair disadvantage onto the targeted player. It becomes even more problematic when not just one person is doing, but an entire group, and even more so still when the group as a whole selects specific targets to snipe and cooperates to do so.
And unfortunately, that's exactly what's been happening.
I'm going to quote Hark here:
The bottom-line is that this is absolutely not okay.
Regrettably, I've learned this was taking place even during our first competitions too, so now even sans boosting I'm forced to reevaluate the merit of our top-placers. But that aside, let's focus on what it means for this season.
After discussing it with the staff, we've decided that we cannot in good consciousness honor the top-placers of this season who were involved in this activity, and unfortunately, the majority of the people who would have won places, were indeed involved. For the sake of avoiding drama, I do not intend to list the names of the guilty- and I would appreciate it if the other users who know would display the same tact. They already know who they are, so there's little point.
We cannot honor the top places by listed rank alone, however, unlike with boosting, which affects only one's personal score, it's not so easy to just skip the guilty party and go to the next on the list. Because of the general warp that sniping has had on the ladder's competitors as a whole, I am sorry to say, we have no option but to annul this season's competition entirely.
For that I am sorry. I realise that's disappointing, and I myself am very disappointed that this has even happened in the first place. I'm further aggrieved that we do not have a long term solution to reliably detect this activity. And as such, I'm further sorry to say that we cannot hold ladder competitions- at least in this format- again in the foreseeable future. It would be folly to do so until we have a reliable way to either detect or prohibit this behavior.
So that's a thing. Sorry to say it, guys.
IN OTHER LESS DISAPPOINTING NEWS
Well, I'm giving Edge the second half of this post, so here he is: