You may notice yes this is a double post. But it was to serve as proof that this was in fact a social experiment by Godot and I. We wanted to gauge certain things such as the gullibility, and maturity of Reborn. Additionally the lack of responses as a whole shows that many people aren't terribly interested in some more serious issues. I commend those of you that did go out of your way to refute this.
For example there was a quote about 6 or 8 minutes into the video. It was actually taken out of context and twisted.
http://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/ferc-chair-wellinghoff-sees-a-solar-future-and-a-utility-of-the-future
Solar, was not really directly referenced in the video as near as I could tell. It was fairly evident this is just a ponzee scheme. For those of you who gave it a shred of credibility. I'd like to know why? Because of the video? Because it was at Reborn? Because an auth posted it? Are you just not skeptical enough? Something else all together?