Wolfox

yeah, the nintendo console one is unlikely. though I believe he does wish to stay away from characters that did not originate from gaming (only saying this because the smash ballet said only characters who originate from gaming)

the return of Isa confirmed?

but why wouldn't they have to? if the allow manga/anime characters, the floodgates that should stay closed open. it will start with Goku, but soon after Naruto and Bleach fans will start bitching about Ichigo and Naruto, and then One Piece and it goes on and on until there are more characters originating from Manga/anime than there are from games. which completely ruin what smash technically is: a party fighting game where mainly Nintendo characters duke it out with a few exceptions here and there (snake, could and Sonic)

Jotaro and Star Platinum have also been on a nintendo console, so have most of the jump characters. so the limit is about as far out the window as you can toss it if Goku gets into smash.

the issue with goku is this: If he is let in and the boundry from gaming characters is down everyone will need to get in: batman, Superman, naruto, luffy. Where is the limit then?

as far as I know, no.

Welcome, Arkande. Don't worry, I don't think you're the only one who had (or has) nightmares of Cynthia and her Garchomp

So Funamation jokingly released a tweet wbout Goku for smash 5. And suddenly the great Melee vs Brawl devide has reappeared with the people who do and don't want Goku in smash. And as much as I want interesting character, I side with the no side. because obvious reasons (I kinda dislike Dragonball, Goku may have apeared in games but he didn't originate in games, all that stuff). I won't get into any debates on this because I literally just shared my opinion on it and if you disagree with me than feel free to do so but please don't try to get me into a discussion about it. Honestly, if you want an interesting character, go pester Konami about getting Snake back, and maybe get some Castlevania characters too.

the perfect system: there is non. Where there is "balance" for one thing, there will be unbalance for another

While I'm not a huge fan of the balance there is now, I like to think that it's at least better than in gen 5 where Dragons and Rain teams could just shpw up anywhere and win most of the time (but no-1 thanks fairies for balancing Dragons more. noooooo it's always the target of "It's a broken type that needs to get nerfed!"). Some types and mons are simply better than others. Example's are Fairy being a strong type while Bug is a weaker one.

why would I do anything other than telling him to be more careful and then go away?

Worms is a weird franchise sometimes. But you can not really argue that it can be one of the most fun games to play with friends. And what better way to talk about such a franchise than by sharing our opinions on our favorite weapons in the game! One rule for this: Concrete Donkey is eliminated. Because I know most everyone has a love-hate relationship with it. but with that being said, LET'S GO! So, my favorites are a bit odd. I like Kamikaze and the Shotgun. I like Kamikaze because when I always played Worms with my best friend I would always get a kill with it. And the Shotgun is just so fun to me because you can technically get a 2 for one kill (in the 3d game Worms 4 Mayhem it's usually my go-to weapon. I can snipe with the shotty) and if you are lucky you can just shoot two people off a ledge.

I'd say something like Skyrim, West of loathing, Divinity Original Sin 2. Maybe Rogue Legacy or mark of the Ninja?

Exactly

I would not even be surprised

there's more honor in knowing when not to fight than just punching for a slap

just don't question how we dutch name things. it usually makes no sense

the calzone's I've had were always the same, pepperoni based pizzas with an egg. and Texas is really just a more spicy pepperoni. and Mexican is a pizza with corn beans and that stuff