Spineblade

Yes, actually 60

57

55

11.86

Cow... Kye? Cow.

53

Savour the moment while you can, Eterna. 51

49 Surprised we got this far without spamming

41

Yeah, despite the increased shiny rate, it's still incredibly unlikely to get 3 of them in such quick succession. I don't know the exact probability, but it's... low.

Banned because I just read the OP and it says: "NEW RULE: You cannot ban the person who banned you. In other words, it can't go: Billy banned Mays for [insert reason here]! Mays banned Billy for [insert reason here]!" So we've all broken that rule so we're all banned.

I could have just not posted here, since I've already done it, but oh well. Juu?

28

Banned because source? I don't think so. Just check the news.

Nah. Micky

*comes out of my cave* ...here. Wait, mde is in the thread. You're next.

Banned because what didn't I do?

Dhan? I... I don't think so. Um...Viri...

Well, that's certainly not where I was expecting that to go. I do want to make the point that I wasn't necessarily requiring the unique appearance of a Pokémon to be based on its IVs, but rather a new random variable. Hidden for that would be fine, I guess, but others may disagree. Also, another thing to consider is that different possible appearances for Pokémon are subjectively appreciated, so one person might prefer a different eye colour or 'fragile' look to another person; what I'm getting at is that there would be no objectively good appearance for a Pokémon, whereas, unless you're going for a Trick Room team or something, high IVs are pretty much objectively good in a competitive Pokémon.

...I'm just gonna assume that predicted Juu. Micky?

Have a 10 for tonight.