cicada

[unvote] jelly. [eliminate] Anti-Loser. Sure, that works.

Matt, we don’t have mafia in this game. I’m confused, am I supposed to keep my vote where it is or did we decide to lynch AL instead? Apologies for not responding until now, but I’ve been kinda busy irl.

You've softclaimed Drunk, and seemingly implied being Cop.

That is exactly why I'm confused about this point. There is nothing from him that suggests he was working with either of us. I really don't like jelly's recent behaviour. He's tried to claim 2 different roles so far in this game, and I have a hard time believing he is either of them. He's also seemingly just blindly followed onto a bandwagon, and I'm really not for his seemingly contradicting behaviour. [Eliminate] jelly. It seems scummy that you're following on with what Nick has requested without a reason why. He could be a cultist or a cult leader. This is basically handing both cults a sign that says "please do not visit this person". It would be wise you didn't affirm things like this if you care about town's victory. I actually find it kind of amusing that people are trying to form a bandwagon when most of the players are inactive. Basically whoever starts the bandwagon has free reign over who gets lynched and who doesn't. Feels kinda cheap, doesn't it? Seems no matter what I do or say, there is no way out of this situation. I guess it would be a shame if town lost an additional 2 votes for lynching me.

I'm just posting this since apparently I'm Reborn illiterate and can't post this in the same post as my previous message. Just to prove I'm not making this up.

From my understanding here, jelly is trying to claim Cop or Dreamer, no?: Prey tell why you would all insist on following up on this claim when he also "confirmed" that the Drunk did not visit Kiet on, I believe, N0? You'd only be able to do this if you were the Drunk yourself, or knew who the Drunk was and someone else watched the person the Drunk visited. I don't see any other explanation for this. If you're just "backing up" to form a bandwagon, then I think it's safe to say you're a part of one of the cults. If you have any explanation for your "backing up", I'd love to hear it. This part confuses me. Like, all of it does. I have never played with Arch before, so I'm not fully aware of his play style, so I find it odd that this conclusion has been made. How do you know this? There's nothing in the flavour text of the posts to suggest they have or haven't found the Granny? This sort of implies that you might know more than what you are letting on. I think I know what you're referring to here. Would you, perhaps, expand on this? Present your case for each of us, if you will, so that I can maybe understand your reasoning.

Monokuma's involved now? Dammit.

If you're not sure what people are doing, I think it's best to place "random" votes on someone who has yet to be voted for rather than following the crowd. Especially if you don't fully agree with their line of thought~ You're not doing anything wrong right now, but it's just something to note for future phases.

Y’all do realise that, if we continue voting individually, everyone voted will be lynched? Yeah, I’m not sure I want to go ahead with that. Can’t say the same for everyone else, but I’ve literally posted once (well, this will be my second post of the phase). How can you get weird vibes from one message? As for voting, I don’t want to add another person to the tie. I’m not really a fan of Nano’s behaviour thus far, so I’ll stick a vote there. Apologies if I’m wrong, but I really don’t have any problems with anyone else yet. [Eliminate] Nano4.

He wishes. uwu

In for a chance of that sweet Granny role (I deserve it after all this time...) and hopefully no more Lovers curse. >_>

Do you mean non-visiting town role?

Yes, hello. I see me, too. [eliminate] Amine.

There is also a scenario in which a role can force their target to visit someone else, I believe? I'm not so sure if it would be in the setup, but you know. I didn't get any system message either. I've currently got a scum lean on Amine because of meta information from previous games. Considering people are voting for Ali, I do want to hear more about this supposed lead from Lía before I make my decision.

Sign me up, bitch.

Hm. I guess the last maf role to disclose is the Briber. My theory for Nick is that he might have been the Sun Worshipper. Maybe he had some kind of ability that prevented someone’s lynch in exchange for his life. I don’t know if that’s right, but I don’t think it sounds too out there. I mean, it’s still also very likely that someone else tampered with the lynch, but my idea probably isn’t a bad one. It’s also the only role on the list I can think of that might have some involvement with lynches. [disclose] The Briber. As for Bean’s flip, I do apologise for that and I wouldn’t oppose to being lynched if that satisfies people. It was, really, the only lead I had (besides the weird behaviour of a few individuals, eg. Drago) but that flip makes me think about other individuals and suspect them just the same. However, Sopheria’s flip makes me suspect Drago a little bit less. I’ll wait a little before voting since I’m sure people will fire bullets at me for the events of yesterday’s lynch. I must say that today’s phase post etc. was quite odd, but maybe that was due to Alaris having a lack of time to make a detailed post. Maybe. I don’t know.

Just so you’re aware, the ‘saving it for tomorrow’ part was about my explanation for Nick’s lynch, not about Bean.

The only lead we have to go by right now is that you claimed to be Immolator in a temporary chat, Bean. I’d rather follow that lead instead of running around like a headless chicken (hehe) and not knowing what to do, even if it happens to be inaccurate. I will explain better during the next day phase, should I survive that long, so I’ll just ask for people to trust me (and please shift your disclose votes to either mafia roles!) and vote for Bean.

This is simply perhaps Bean being Bean, but I received word that Bean claimed Immolator. Also, Nick's lynch being of his own doing is a gut feeling of mine. I will probably explain next day phase in more detail, but I have an idea of sorts that seems kind of feasible. If you and Kiet were fighting over who should be Mayor, I think it's safe to assume that only one of you was Mafia. This is me saying I don't believe you're also Mafia. Do what you want to do, but I believe you. We must protect and side with our Mayor after all. \o/

Okay, guys. Here’s the deal. [eliminate] Bean. I have reason to believe he is mafia and not the ancient being. Do what you will, but this is my decision. I’m also going to throw a disclose vote at another mafia role, because we honestly need to disclose those first. I don’t agree to wasting a day disclosing something that is obvious to me. [disclose] The Piercer.

Honestly, I think mafia is either out of Bean or Matt. It's not both of them. I also have information about something that took place during N2 which makes me suspect one of the people involved. Coincidentally, Bean is involved in it.

Guys, I can't say for certain because I honestly do not know, but I have reason to believe that Nick's lynch was of his own doing. Bean might not be the ancient being. Also, I'm not really sure why we're trying to disclose the vanilla townie role since it's very likely it isn't even in the setup. Besides, we might waste a disclose vote on something pointless if it comes back saying what we already know about it.

Inb4 the ancient being doesn’t exist anymore.