Jump to content

Eeveelution Hurt/heal


Wolfox

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 492
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Jolteon: 16

Vaporeon: 18

Flareon: 5

Umbreon: 19

Espeon: 23

Leafeon: 14

Glaceon: 21

Sylveon: 17

 

@Hooligan nobody is arguing that gen 1 isn't overrated, granted the hate garbodor to muk comparison is usually one used by Genwunners to "proof" that gen 5 is bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is the same on all generations : somes bad mons and some styled mons.

 

 

Yeah gen 5 has a bunch of " bad " mons ( i mean ridiculous design ) like vanilluxe or garbodor , but on the other hand just look at zoroark or haxorus how beautifull they are. Zoroark is probably one of the best pokemon ever created in term of design imo. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gen 5 had a good number of quality mons. And the Vaniluxe line at least makes some sense in the cannon, as Ice Cream in the pokémon world is based on them. But, can we all agree that both in lore and design Chandelure is the best gen 5 mon? I mean, come on. It's a fucking haunted chandelier (probably got mad at Sia for some reason?).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Hooligan said:

Well, I don't like some of the Pokemon like Vaporeon, because they look way too weird.

 

People only gave love to Vaporeon, because it's a Eeveelution. Now, if it was a evolution of a ordinary Pokemon, it would be considered ugly by most of the people. Vaporeon is overrated as hell for that reason. Also, I think that hybrid Pokemon such as Vaporeon, Type: Null, Silvally and other ones that I can't remember, are all ugly. Also, Gen 1 is overrated in General.

 

Do you see that people hate Garbodor from Gen 5 and like Muk from Gen 1? I would say that I disagree with this hate, because Garbodor was a creative work, at least, making a Pokemon that reminds about the trash from New York. And Muk? You can identify the problem of this one in the name. Muk is a pollution Pokemon, too bland, because it's all purple. Gen 1 is illogical, empty, glitched and ugly, and so is Vaporeon.

 

Basically, in my opinion, a blue Floatzel with two big ears would fit way much better for a Eeveelution than Vaporeon, because how the hell a mammal will suffer a mutation to become a fish?

 

I'm sorry if I was rude or if I did something wrong here. You know that I have no intention to offend anyone, I just needed to say about that. It's just that mutation makes absolutely no sense for me.

 

That's all, thanks and sorry.

It's ok. You didn't really offend anyone just by stating your opinion.

 

Vaporeon just happens to be my favorite mon. Not because I'm a genwunner or because it's an Eeveelution. I just happen to like everything about it. And Vaporeon was always the mon I could rely on no matter what. Even after 7 generations that hasn't changed.

 

And I don't like weird evo's either (Dewott -> Samurott wtf happened there? Remoraid -> Octillery etc) I don't include Vaporeon amongst those. Imo all Eeveelutions fit and don't look that weird compared to other evolution lines. But aside from Vaporeon, none of them rank that high on my list of favorites. Espeon and Leafeon are ok and Umbreon's design is nice but that's about it. 

 

Also while I'm a genwunner, I have no problem admitting gen 5 has the best Pokédex. That actually says a lot since my interest in Pokémon was at it's lowest when gen 5 came out and I thought most of them were unoriginal and without any effort (Zebstrika, Swanna for example). Hell, gen 5 even has the mons I despise the most with those goddamn Elemental Monkeys and Keldeo.

 

The thing about gen 1 is that, for those who grew up with it, it's acceptable that the mons might be illogical and the games were unbalanced and glitched. Psychic was broken AF but imo gen 1 has some really great mons. Gengar, Venusaur, Gyarados, Alakazam, Arcanine, etc have all great designs and are fun to use.

 

 

Edit: I forgot to vote lol

Jolteon: 13

Vaporeon: 18

Flareon: 5

Umbreon: 16

Espeon: 23

Leafeon: 14

Glaceon: 21

Sylveon: 16

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Chim said:

It's ok. You didn't really offend anyone just by stating your opinion.

 

Vaporeon just happens to be my favorite mon. Not because I'm a genwunner or because it's an Eeveelution. I just happen to like everything about it. And Vaporeon was always the mon I could rely on no matter what. Even after 7 generations that hasn't changed.

 

And I don't like weird evo's either (Dewott -> Samurott wtf happened there? Remoraid -> Octillery etc) I don't include Vaporeon amongst those. Imo all Eeveelutions fit and don't look that weird compared to other evolution lines. But aside from Vaporeon, none of them rank that high on my list of favorites. Espeon and Leafeon are ok and Umbreon's design is nice but that's about it. 

 

Also while I'm a genwunner, I have no problem admitting gen 5 has the best Pokédex. That actually says a lot since my interest in Pokémon was at it's lowest when gen 5 came out and I thought most of them were unoriginal and without any effort (Zebstrika, Swanna for example). Hell, gen 5 even has the mons I despise the most with those goddamn Elemental Monkeys and Keldeo.

 

The thing about gen 1 is that, for those who grew up with it, it's acceptable that the mons might be illogical and the games were unbalanced and glitched. Psychic was broken AF but imo gen 1 has some really great mons. Gengar, Venusaur, Gyarados, Alakazam, Arcanine, etc have all great designs and are fun to use.

 

5

In that case, I would not classify you as a genwunner. as those simply deem all other generation inferior to gen one in every way. your favorite gen is gen 1 (I assume), but you do accept that it was a broken mess and that most gens did improve upon it. And not a single person can say gen 5 doesn't have dumb shit in there, but when it has the largest Regional Dex to date, that's going to happen non the less (granted even the "lazy" ones from gen 5 are better than the "lazy" ones from gen 1 IMO).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Chim said:

Also while I'm a genwunner, I have no problem admitting gen 5 has the best Pokédex. That actually says a lot since my interest in Pokémon was at it's lowest when gen 5 came out and I thought most of them were unoriginal and without any effort (Zebstrika, Swanna for example).

If those are your views, then you don't fit the definition of a genwunner.  If you acknowledge any gens besides 1 and 2 (begrudgingly), you aren't a genwunner

 

25 minutes ago, Chim said:

The thing about gen 1 is that, for those who grew up with it, it's acceptable that the mons might be illogical and the games were unbalanced and glitched. Psychic was broken AF but imo gen 1 has some really great mons. Gengar, Venusaur, Gyarados, Alakazam, Arcanine, etc have all great designs and are fun to use.

 

I also grew up with Red, but I don't feel the gen 1 mons should get a pass for some of their lazy designs just because of their seniority.  All gens have great mons and all gens have lazy designs.

 

 

and @Wolfox ninja'd most of my points while I was finishing typing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...