Jump to content

Episode 18: Rock on? (Opinions on the episode)


Zander

Recommended Posts

  Reveal hidden contents
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 8/24/2018 at 9:27 PM, Zander said:
  Reveal hidden contents

 

Expand  

Please say you're joking about believing him to be related to Aya. Hardy is related to Titania, Cain is related to Aya and Aya is in tsundere mode towards Hardy (I think he likes her back). Remember his rant about him and Tania both liking rock types but she ditched rock for steel with the discovery of the type and he ended up being salty over that so he fought to become stronger than the more popular steel type with his rock mons. Also I don't know whether the time is stated to which Adrienn has been in the arc for but it wouldn't have been 70 years.

 

E18 will naturally be perceived to be better by everyone due to its story-heavy focus.

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

Also the spoiler tags are needed as not everyone pays close attention / ignores when people say in a plain text thing that there are spoilers so that's why I put E18 related content in the spoiler thing. That way, people can't bitch about you ruining the episode despite warnings. It's a way to protect yourself from anything if someone complains to a senior member of the forums so you can show you've done all you can to not spoil the game for others.

 

Away from that though, I really enjoyed what was revealed during E18 within:

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

I'm looking forward to seeing what E19's leader and the E4 & Champ bring to the table.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 8/24/2018 at 9:27 PM, Zander said:

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

Expand  
  Reveal hidden contents

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 8/24/2018 at 9:57 PM, Tacos said:
  Reveal hidden contents

 

Expand  
  Reveal hidden contents

 

  On 8/24/2018 at 9:57 PM, Tacos said:
  Reveal hidden contents

 

Expand  
  Reveal hidden contents

 

  On 8/24/2018 at 9:27 PM, Zander said:
  Reveal hidden contents

 

Expand  
  Reveal hidden contents

 

  On 8/24/2018 at 9:27 PM, Zander said:
  Reveal hidden contents

 

Expand  
  Reveal hidden contents

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  Reveal hidden contents

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  Reveal hidden contents

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  Reveal hidden contents

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 8/25/2018 at 1:15 AM, The Swordsman said:
  Reveal hidden contents

 

Expand  
  Reveal hidden contents

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 8/25/2018 at 2:15 AM, wcv said:
  Reveal hidden contents

 

Expand  
  Reveal hidden contents

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  Reveal hidden contents

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 9/3/2018 at 7:06 PM, robin1 said:
  Reveal hidden contents

 

Expand  

Lol yeah it ate a discharge from my modest full sp attack invested Magnezone and brought it to sturdy with Earthquake even though I had almost max hp and some defense Evs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 9/4/2018 at 10:19 PM, wcv said:

It didn't have over-maxed out EVs, only Garchomp did. Gyarados survived Discharge because it was carrying a berry that weakens electric moves.

Expand  

100% not possible.

I have a modest nature 31 iv 252 sp attack Magnezone using a STAB Discharge. No Gyarados(times 4 weakness) can ever survive that without EVs in special defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 9/4/2018 at 10:23 PM, Zander said:

100% not possible.

I have a modest nature 31 iv 252 sp attack Magnezone using a STAB Discharge. No Gyarados(times 4 weakness) can ever survive that without EVs in defense.

Expand  

See what I said after the word "because".

 

A level 90 Magnezone with a sp. attack stat of 355 (which is max evs and ivs with a modest nature) will deal 260-308 damage to Gyarados while said Gyarados is holding a Wacan berry. Gyarados's hp at level 90 with max HP Ivs with 0 HP evs is 298, leaving only an 18% chance of a OHKO. So not only is it not 100% not possible, its far MORE likely than knocking it out in one hit.

 

By contrast a Gyarados with max Special Defense and Max HP will still be OHKO's by a Discharge from Magnezone without the berry.

Edited by wcv
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guess I'll have to teach Magnezone Thunderbolt then and hope for the best.

 

It's so weird that making an attack times 2 effective is much better than max hp and sp def. That literally will never make sense to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 9/5/2018 at 3:05 AM, Zander said:

It's so weird that making an attack times 2 effective is much better than max hp and sp def. That literally will never make sense to me.

Expand  

Yay, math time.

 

So the Pokemon damage formula is:

 

Damage = ((((Level*2)/5+2) * Power * Attack/Defense)/50 + 2) * Modifier.

 

Modifier includes type advantages. Now, what this means in simple terms is that defense isn't nearly as relevant to damage prevention as it kinda implies. Only a single number is reduced by defense, that being the Pokemon in question's attack, and even that is limited due to the decreasing relevance of denominators as the numbers get bigger (that is to say there's only so small a divided number can get until you just can't divide it anymore). But by adding another *2 multiplier to the modifier you have drastically increased the damage with no similiar issues.

 

Pokemon is a highly offensive oriented game fora reason. 

 

Now of course there are defensive Pokemon, but they either have extremely high defense stats, good ways to boost those stats (or both), and nearly always need a good typing to prevent being run over by a 4* weakness. Gyarados meanwhile has both a 4* weakness, and crap defenses. Meaning that if it gets hit by a 4* effective move its just done. The wacan berry more or less just lets it survive what would normally one shot it, and only once.

Edited by wcv
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 9/5/2018 at 1:39 PM, wcv said:

Yay, math time.

 

So the Pokemon damage formula is:

 

Damage = ((((Level*2)/5+2) * Power * Attack/Defense)/50 + 2) * Modifier.

 

Modifier includes type advantages. Now, what this means in simple terms is that defense isn't nearly as relevant to damage prevention as it kinda implies. Only a single number is reduced by defense, that being the Pokemon in question's attack, and even that is limited due to the decreasing relevance of denominators as the numbers get bigger (that is to say there's only so small a divided number can get until you just can't divide it anymore). But by adding another *2 multiplier to the modifier you have drastically increased the damage with no similiar issues.

 

Pokemon is a highly offensive oriented game fora reason. 

 

Now of course there are defensive Pokemon, but they either have extremely high defense stats, good ways to boost those stats (or both), and nearly always need a good typing to prevent being run over by a 4* weakness. Gyarados meanwhile has both a 4* weakness, and crap defenses. Meaning that if it gets hit by a 4* effective move its just done. The wacan berry more or less just lets it survive what would normally one shot it, and only once.

Expand  

Holy crap.

So basically the end result being multiplied is much more effective than one component of the equation being divided. But if suppose the end result were to be divided then the defense would be much more relevant(which it is not because that's just how the formula works). Is this damage output in actual HP? So an attack will do exactly as much damage to the HP as would be calculated here? Thanks for the explanation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 9/5/2018 at 4:23 PM, Zander said:

Holy crap.

So basically the end result being multiplied is much more effective than one component of the equation being divided. But if suppose the end result were to be divided then the defense would be much more relevant(which it is not because that's just how the formula works). Is this damage output in actual HP? So an attack will do exactly as much damage to the HP as would be calculated here? Thanks for the explanation.

Expand  

Yep. So if we take the Magnzone and Gyarados example it works like so (assuming both Pokemon are level 90)

 

((((90*2/5)+2) * 80 * 355 / 213) / 50) * (4*.85*1/2*1.5).

 

Modifier for our purposes will be 4 * boost due to the weakness, a random value of 0.85 (the lowest), a Wacan berry so 1/2, and finally STAB bonus of 1.5

 

So to simplify a bit we have:

 

((38*80*1.65)/50 +2 ) * 2.55

Damage is thus 260, with Gyarados having hp of 298.

 

Now if we assume a randomized roll of 1 (the highest value then our formula looks like this:

 

((((90*2/5)+2) * 80 * 355 / 213) / 50) * (4*1/2*1.5).

 

And we wind up with total damage of 308. Due to the randomizer ranging from 0.85 to 1.0 there are 16 total possible damage outputs, with the highest 3 knocking Gyarados out in one hit, and the remaining 13 leaving it with at least 1 hp.

 

Now if remove the Wacan berry all of this doubles, meaning any hit will immediately OHKO the Gyarados. If we assume maxed out HP and Special Defense IVs and no berry then:

 

((((90*2/5)+2) * 80 * 355 / 269) / 50) * (4*.85*1.5).

 

Total Damage output is 412, against an HP total of only 355, leaving a OHKO. 


Since I'm sure you're tired of me going full math geek on you, I'll just give the results if it has maxed out Special Defense IVs AND a Wacan Berry: Damage is 202. Damage went down by about 58 from the example above of a Wacan berry and minimal Special Defense investment. That might sound like a lot (and it sorta is, about a 1/5 decrease), BUT it actually is irrelevant. Why? Because Gyarados still only has 355 hp with max investment. Meaning it STILL can't take two discharges regardless of the investment in HP and Special Defense (and also assuming it had another Wacan berry, which it can't). Meaning regardless of what Gyarados's Special Defense and Attack it still straight up folds to double discharge. Here's the kicker, even if you gave it a Special Defense boosting nature, it still can't take two hits, with damage dropping to 188, leavng it well within range of a second Discharge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...